Koha Test Wiki Canasta - March 2024

One of a series of test instances for migrating the Koha Wiki MediaWiki database.

For the current Koha Wiki, visit https://wiki.koha-community.org .

Talk:DB schema bugs

From Koha Test Wiki Canasta
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Table name singular or plural ?


colinC: If using DBIx::Class and possibly other db orms the orm generates a consistent singular name for each object
(PP) copy of what was written on coding_guidelines page:

   * table in singular [+] or plural [+++++] form ? 
 //Tables in the plural make for some odd sounding code once you start using an ORM. 
 It sounds more logical to say $borr = Borrower->new(); than $borr = Borrowers->new(); We should be thinking about this in terms of moving toward a more 
 Class based concept (DBIx::Class) than in the handcrafted SQL of old. The main thing is to be consistent.
 Conversely, having a Borrowers class sounds better than having a Borrower class.  It's marginal as long as consistent.//

(PP) singular, for the same reason as ColinC & the one who wrote ("It sounds more logical to say $borr = Borrower->new(); than $borr = Borrowers->new();")


Table names include _ or no ?

Table names prefixed or no ?


should we call 'users of the libraries' members, patrons, borrowers or users ?

(PP) copy of what was written on coding_guidelines page:

   * Should we use patron [++], member [], borrowers [] ? (This question is nonsense because they mean different things: members and borrowers are subsets of patrons.)

PP: my preference would to to patron or user

opac_news table is not only for opac news, but also for staff interface


The following tables requires a Primary key:

accountoffsets

aqorderdelivery

borrower_attributes

branches

branchtransfers

browser

deletedborrowers

import_biblios

import_record_matches

language_script_bidi

language_script_mapping

matcher_matchpoints

matchpoint_component_norms

message_queue

notifys

kf: araik this table is no longer used and could be removed along with other code related to this feature.

nozebra

PP => this table is deprecated, it's OK

old_issues

old_reserves

reserveconstraints

reserves

search_history

serialitems

sessions

PP => this table has a UNIQUE KEY `id`, we should move to PRIMARY KEY

statistics

stopwords

tmp_holdsqueue

user_permissions

virtualshelfcontents


Merge biblio and biblioitems


Rename categories to borrower_category


Primary key name (id, xxxid, xxxcode, xxxnumber)


Column name with a _


Tinyint(1) changed to BOOLEAN

PP: Is there a BOOLEAN type in standard SQL ? marcelr: Would not recommend that. BOOL is an alias for tinyint(1); so that does not make a difference. Also i remember that there are/were some problems with boolean fields in MySQL.

Update letters table to have a primary key instead of a constructed PK


accountlines.accountno should be a foreign key for accountoffsets.accountno

the table need_merge_authorities could be removed and replaced by a column in authority table

marcelr: Is in use only when pref dontmerge==Do not update automatically. Most libraries will update automatically and will not use this table (and leave it empty). The current construction preserves space.

Unused tables

kf: following tables seem to be no longer used and are probably candidates for deletion:

  • notifys
  • ethnicity
  • printers

Unused columns

kf: following columns seem to be no longer used and are probably candidates for deletion:

  • borrowers.ethnotes / deletedborrowers.ethnotes
  • borrowers.ethnicity / deletedborrowers.ethnicity