Koha Test Wiki Canasta - March 2024
One of a series of test instances for migrating the Koha Wiki MediaWiki database.
For the current Koha Wiki, visit https://wiki.koha-community.org .Guidelines for Patch Acceptance/Rejection
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following guidlines for getting your patch accepted in Koha were compiled from a thread on the koha-devel mailing list
- The patch must do what it claims to do, in all commonly-supported Koha environments.
- Include Unit Tests if at all possible.
- The patch must not break existing functionality.
- The patch must apply to the current HEAD of the master branch of the code.
- All patches which will not apply cleanly to maintenance versions should be ported and submitted as separate patches marked as such.
- The patch must follow the Coding Style Guidelines.
- This includes the copyright statement.
- The patch must be MARC-flavour agnostic.
- If a database update is require, the patch must handle the update both for new installs and upgrades.
- If a new feature is added, the patch must include appropriate Help documentation.
- The patch must have at least 1 signoff from another party who is outside the organization responsible for the patch. The patch must then be signed off by a memer of the QA team. Exceptions may be made by the QA team or release manager for trivial patches
- The patch must refer to a bug number
- To avoid cases where the bug number could be stripped from the patch during the Git workflow, please don't enclose the bug number in square brackets. In other words, don't do "[Bug 1234]", do "Bug 1234:"
Additional characteristics of a good patch
- The patch covers a single topic
- The patch is easy to read
- The patch does not contain the detritus of your coding process